Yearwood. Thank you, Mr. Meeks. Thank you for your management on Click for source Caribbean issues. I am going to deal with two problems here mostly, and I will leave my associates to attend to a few of the others. I believe one of the essential problems that the Caribbean has is competitiveness. And I believe to make better usage of U.S.- Caribbean trade arrangements a lot of the competitive concerns require to be dealt with - How old of an rv can you finance. I discussed in my testament that the IDP they are doing a great deal of work on trade assistance. That is going to be crucial to getting the Caribbean more able to type of have single windows, lower the costs of transportation, and lower the cost of clearance in moving items.
Concerns such as taking a trip from one Caribbean island to the other can be more expensive than going to Miami and then returning down. So there are a great deal of concerns that the Caribbean needs to deal with in order to end up being a more competitive place to do company and to trade more efficiently. I didn't want to, nevertheless, not seize the day to state something about Haiti. I did live there for 13 years and I do follow what is going on there really carefully. And I think it is incredibly vital that the HOPE costs not just go to 2020, but go-- there needs to be some sustainability to what is going to be successful the HOPE bill following 2020.
Parliament is unstable to say the least, sort of an interim President that might or might not constitutional. I am not a Haitian constitutional professional, but I have concerns. But at this moment in time, what Haiti needs more than anything else once this specific point of political problem is conquered, Haiti is going to require sustainability and stability to its relationship for trade and financial investment with the United States. So I think that is a crucial issue that the Congress needs to keep its eye on. Thank you. Mr. Meeks. Yes, sir. Mr. Farnsworth. If I could simply reinforce what Sally just stated, the problem of competitiveness is genuine and we deal with the company community all the time.
Therefore there needs to be in my view a particular attention to investment climate concerns. Energy is part of that. It is definitely not the only element. I believe we also have to know unintended repercussions. And you have actually done some actually good work certainly on the trade program, Mr. Meeks. Plainly the TPP is something that Council of the Americas supports. We value your management and others of the subcommittee on that. But there are possibly some unintended consequences. And for example, when the North American Open Market Arrangement was first passed among the strongest advocates for something that ended up being known as NAFTA Parity was Ambassador Richard Bernal of Jamaica who entered into the U.S.
It is an advantage, but we wish to make certain that Jamaica and the other Caribbean nations are not negatively impacted by the trade and investment diversion that may go to Mexico as an outcome of NAFTA. I think that was a very essential point then and it is a very essential point now. And to the extent that TPP moves forward, and again I hope that it does. I strongly support it and we hope that it is a near term issue. Nevertheless, with some brand-new entrants into textiles, for example, and agriculture that are extremely competitive in the global environment that will impact nations in the Caribbean Basin.
How What Can You Do With A Degree In Finance can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
taxpayer help to which we support, however once again the issue is one of trade and investment diversion. We need to be mindful that doing the "ideal thing" with other economies we are not adversely affecting some economies which are currently worried. And so what is the answer here? I believe the response is to go back to the original idea in some method of NAFTA Parity only this is TPP parity, right? If Haiti, for instance, is dependent on the textiles trade with the United States, we I believe need to ensure that whatever we perform in TPP does not needlessly undermine that or does not develop difficulties in a way that would remove some of those benefits that Congress has actually worked so hard over the years to develop.
So my point is that if we take a look at these in a more detailed way, in a method that where you have a great deal of different, integration of different hairs, then I think we will come to a better location. Therefore as we are looking at these concerns strategically, I simply quite assistance the manner in which you are putting this in the context of it is not simply this problem or that concern or another issue, it is all of these together and how can we move on in a detailed integrated manner in assistance of the Caribbean, and I think that is what we have to keep primary in mind.
Bernal. Let me start by thanking you, Congressman Meeks, for your constant management on Caribbean issues. In reaction to the concern that you raise, I think that the onus is not only on the U.S (How to owner finance a home). however is on the Caribbean. We in the Caribbean have to do some things to make it much easier for company to operate and to become worldwide competitive. I stay convinced that if we develop the best sort of environment in between the U.S. and the Caribbean that there how much does a timeshare cost monthly href="https://webhitlist.com/profiles/blogs/unknown-facts-about-how-to-calculate-finance-charge-on-car-loan">how to get rid of an llc is personal sector effort on investment and there are opportunities, extremely genuine opportunities which can happen by integrating Caribbean and U.S.